Theological Arms Race?

So, I was reading a post over on Doug's Dribblings and something popped into my head as I read the following sentence:

... I also have a dislike for the idea of "chosen" people. Fatalism and predestination in the divine scheme of things just don't appeal to me at all ...

It occurred to me that many religious/theologic constructs tend to proclaim in some form or fashion that those who have complete faith and give total buy in to a particular religion will gain favor and blessing from eternal bliss in heaven to 72 virgins (I don't think it's specified as to which gender said virgins possess so ... ) and so on et. al. Anyway, I got to thinking that earlier religions had an ever growing cadre of task specific gods that handled particular issues  and as more issues arose, more gods were created to address them ... I can see how such a convoluted and unwieldy org chart of deities could rapidly become confusing not to mention expensive in the form of proper offerings to curry favor with the specific god that handled your specific needs at a give time.

It seems that after a pretty good run, the polytheistic religions started to lose favor and followers as new religions with more streamlined customer support were implemented. Certain tribes - perhaps simply because they were excluded from participating in specific religions due to race, status, nationality etc. - may have simply developed their own version of the best gods from the polytheistic religions and tailored their new god's requirements to their own customs and means.

And of you're going to tailor make a god, you may as well dress it up to the nines and give it powers that surpass that of your oppressors gods, right? In a world during a time when human knowledge of the natural world was rudimentary, gods "just had" to be the source and cause for things like earthquakes, lighting, shooting stars, diseases etc. And why have many gods that handle individual issues when you can make one that handles multiple issues ... and if this god were powerful enough to take on all these takes ... maybe they could use that "power" to intimidate foes in other tribes/lands.

Much like how weapons began their development, so too did these theologies/religions morph into more refined, more powerful more all encompassing dogmas. As the generations tick by, each new generation refined, detailed and perfected their religion ... just like how the world went from mortars to conventional bombs and ultimately to the A-bomb and then to ICBMs delivering multiple warheads.

Back then, there was no such awesome man made power - but there were existing religions, but they didn't quite fit everyone's needs so some made new gods/religions to fill those needs ... they changed the structure ... instead of one problem, one god ... why not one god, many problems addressed - provided you yous the proper rite, incantation, prayer etc. to invoke your god to help ... a real one size fits all deal that is easier to deal with because it's streamlined and efficient and you can go to one temple to do your theological laundry ... a real on stop shop.

It's no small wonder it caught on. And since you didn't have to spread your wealth around to many gods/temples, you'd have more resources available to conquer your enemies and slaughter and subjugate them like they had once done to you. So the religions with the most efficient "requirements" that allowed to to pay your respects, make your offerings and get down to the taks of slaughtering foes with the least daily interruptions were are the religions that ultimately became what we have today in the world.

The only difference is, now we really don't even need them because we have a real good grasp on how the natural world works ... so either some religions will reinvent themselves (notice how Pope Francis is changing doctrine to fit the demands of modern world) ... and some will just eventually dwindle and wither down to obscure, archaic footnotes to history ... just like muzzle loading muskets.
 
So yeah, I think religions started as a way to explain the (then) unexplained (which we, of course, now know) and morphed into a "My god(s) is/are bigger and more powerful than your god(s) ... just like an arms race ... and who wants to cross the biggest most powerfulestest deity?

Bring on the "arms" reduction treaties ... and soon, please

War on Christianity?!? Really?

Okay ... granted ... a lot of atheists, agnostics, secularists and constitutionalists want to remove "under god" from the Pledge  and take "In God we trust" off the money in favor of "E Pluribus Unum" ... But lets be honest - that's NOT a "war" or even an "attack" ... not even an "affront to sensibilities" (unless those sensibilities are exceptionally sensitive) ... it's really just constitutional common sense that removes the appearance of the government showing any preference of one religion over another or discriminating against no religion at all as the constitution demands.

A "war" is when the government (or mob) forces you to move your church(s) outside the city limits ... but despite the perceived "war", every Sunday, 80,000 people can gleefully sing "God Bless America" in ball parks without fear of reprisal or sanction - and this would STILL be fine and free to do without "under god" in the Pledge. Additionally, every church would STILL be right where it always was and open for "business" just like before ...Now what kind of "war" fails to address the obvious targets - churches and huge gatherings of people loudly singing about God and Country?

None

Nada

Zip

Zero

Zilch

No "war" known to human kind would go out of it's way to AVOID the obvious targets. I mean, really ... what the F*ck? Either this "war" is being executed by the most inept and incompetent folks ever to perpetrate a "war" on anything ever ... or ... it's not a "war" ... and never was. (Hint: It's not a "war" on anything)

You see, when this "war" is over - people will still be able to:

1. Have a church
2. Go to Church (not that the majority of those railing about this horrific "war" actually GO to church but I "get that they like to know they "can" go if they ever were to choose to do so)
3. Pray
4. Carry the Bible in public
5. SELL the Bible openly in (gasp) public bookstores
6. Read the Bible
7. ... you get the idea - there isn't much that would "change" after this "war" has been "fought"

In short, the only changes - as per the constitution - are that the government (who bears the burden of restriction from religion - not the people or religious organizations) won't and shouldn't be able to invoke the word or ideas of any one "god" or religion.

See, then the government uses a term like "god", it excludes other forms of deities that - in this FREE nation - we can choose to worship ... and THAT excludes AMERICANS from feeling fairly treated and represented - YES there are a large number of AMERICANS - born and raised here that don't worship YOUR god du jour ... and THAT is "suppose" to be okay - see, we're supposed to have freedom to do that.

So, for the same exact reason that you, my good christian, find the prospects of saying:

One Nation, Under Buddha

One Nation, Under Vishnu

One Nation, Under Ra
One Nation, Under Thor

One Nation, Under Allah

One Nation, Under Zeus
One Nation, Under Baal
One Nation, Under El

etc. et. al.

Or even perhaps:

One Nation, Under Yahweh

One Nation, Under Jesus

One Nation, Under Jehovah

If you find these very narrow and specific statements preposterous, limiting, narrow, exclusive, divisive etc. congratulations - you now understand why "One Nation, Under god" just does NOT work for a government agency to set in stone WHICH god.

More importantly, am I, and others of similar mind, any less American for not believing in any of these gods at all ... the only difference between you and I is - I (we) don't believe in your god either ... it's just one small step from where you are to where we are.

History has documented 2870 gods/deities that fit the following definition:

"According to The English Dictionary, god is defined as, "a supernatural being, who is worshiped as the controller of some part of the universe, some aspect of life, or is the personification of some force." Included in this definition are all deities, goddesses and supernatural beings. "

The vast majority of US citizens dismiss 2869 of those gods out of hand without losing a minute's sleep worrying if they "might" be wrong ... it would seem the odds may not be in your favor on this point. But you only dismiss all the others because you where taught to do so from birth. It was not some great "revelation" that you had - the idea was seeded in you by humans and by society at large as you grew up.

None the less - no one is asking you to disbelieve and no one is at "war" with you. We only want American government to live up to it's Constitutional mandate - "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ..."

By choosing which god to name in the Pledge and place on the money, the government is establishing a preferred god and religion over all others - this is illegal and should be removed.

Besides - if your faith in your god is really so strong - do you really need your dollar bills to remind you?!? ... I question your commitment to your god if you do.

 

Purging Old/Outdated/Unsupported Beliefs

I follow another blogger - Gary - (http://www.lutherwasnotbornagain.com/) and as I understand he was pretty close to a fundamental believer - or orthodox, if there is any real difference - which I imagine to followers/believers of a faith know as "orthodox" would probably take it as an insult that I equate the two beliefs as virtually synonymous. I'm sure there are differences - but to me, an outsider from all aspects even when i held beliefs in a deity, I don't see too much "wiggle room" between the fundamental and orthodox dogmas. I just don't - when I held belief, I found them equally harsh, strict and overbearing ... inflexibly rigid and unyielding to any other viewpoints or concepts/interpretations. So as a non-believer - well ... they are still as I stated.

So I found it quirky that an orthodox believer would call another former orthodox believer a "fundamentalist" as an ad hominim attack. There's quite the smack down going on over at Gary's blog. And Gary is holding strong to his new found non-belief.

See, Gary states on his blog that his blog is a form of therapy and though he is trying to spread his new found truth, he is also going through the process of purging all the insidious religious mumbo jumbo that was instilled into his mind and life while double checking which parts are based on fact and which are based on fantasy/religion. I know this very feeling - the need to re-verify the very things we used as a foundation for our entire lives. We need to relearn and re-justify EVERYTHING. So it somewhat angers me when his readers (many of them still orthodox/fundamental believers) attack his very person - what's worse is they use his very former orthodox/fundamentalism against him.

So it was okay for him to be a orthodox/fundamentalist as long as he believed, but now that he has lost his faith and no longer believes, his orthodox/fundamentalism is now a detriment!?!?

Well isn't THAT a dandy?!?

Or would that be the pot calling the kettle "Black"?

Point is - this religion stuff is rooted deep and it hides deep deep inside us. It's been molded into our very core foundation since birth for most of us - overtly and covertly. Sometimes with the express purpose to get and keep us on the god team and other times in very subtle, imperceptible ways - such as with our money and our (US) pledge of allegiance.

I generally "came out" as an atheist a couple years ago - it was a very slow very gradual process of the balance of evidence being recognized to show that the world and uni/multiverse are a natural process that has no hint of divine assistance to being what it is. But what really strikes me is all the little tidbits that are instilled in most people - even those who never proclaimed faith in any religion/deity - with a constant, consistent and relentless barrage.

These little bits must constantly be identified, assessed, verified and justified and if found to be based on theology rejected ... or new secular supporting evidence must be found to ground these items on logic, fact and rationale. But it's not as easy as all that - because each bit has other bits built on top of them ... and like a game of Jenga - the whole shebang could come crashing down when you pull out the now unsupported and unsubstantiated bit.

I often find myself in the middle of a conversation and just as I say something I realize that "oops" there's a bit that is founded and based on religion - it has a tendency to derail my point right there on the spot. This is hard stuff! It's no wonder many people - wittingly or not - just give complete buy in to their theology to avoid the headache and hassle. But in reality - it's completely dishonest to one's self to simply say "god did it".

As I watch and read Gary's progression - I can see often where he really wishes the veil had never been removed to reveal the truth about religion - and it's clear why so many don't want to face the hassle. I don't recall the specific moment when Gary was on Bruce Gerencser's (a former baptist preacher turned atheist) blog and had that "AHA" moment (or if it was even through dialogue on that blog) ... you see, I first saw Gary there debating FOR theology ... and then the light bulb went on and the right question finally forced him to question the house of cards of his theology that his life was built on. From there it's been a difficult road of revealing and relearning everything - it's that kick in the groin a kid gets when he learns his parents are really Santa Claus - that heavy can't breathe feeling.

It's hard work to get at the truth and rooting out the falsehoods - it's important to let people do so in a way that helps them come to an understanding with the (provisional) truth of the uni/multiverse. Although I was never indoctrinated to the level of Gary or the multitude of others, this is a hard, long laborious and time consuming venture - but the journey is worth it. An although not all questions are answered, it's kind of cool to be able to say "I don't know" with confidence that one day a real and plausible NATURAL answer will be found without the need to resort to the dark mystique of supernatural magic and the whims of "unknowable" deities.